EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 61 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.
No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water
violations recorded for this supplier.
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Sargeant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sargeant's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Lead, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sargeant serve?
Sargeant reports serving 61 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Sargeant had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Sargeant.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.