← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Dunnell

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 71 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

71
contaminants tested
11
detected
167
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Martin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
3
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1435 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1600 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
429.325 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 745 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
4.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
6/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.286 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.38 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.4 pCi/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
3/3 LCR 2025
Arsenic
8.577 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.64 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014
Barium
21.39 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014
Toluene
133.27 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2018
Cyanide
50 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2014–2016
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
5076952942
Email
dunnell@bevcomm.net

Frequently asked questions about Dunnell

Is Dunnell tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Dunnell's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dunnell's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Chloroform, Lead, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dunnell serve?

Dunnell reports serving 167 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Dunnell had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Dunnell, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.