← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Secluded Acres

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 66 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

66
contaminants tested
6
detected
60
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Beltrami

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
80.67 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 84.9 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
2.135 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
1.9135 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.95 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017
Barium
92.7 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2023
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.5 pCi/L 23%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2017
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
2187662339
Email
secludedacresmhp@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Secluded Acres

Is Secluded Acres tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Secluded Acres's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Secluded Acres's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Secluded Acres serve?

Secluded Acres reports serving 60 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Secluded Acres had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Secluded Acres, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.