Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfpea | 0.0030 µg/L | 1/12 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 103 µg/L 172% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 737/739 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 115 µg/L 144% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 731/732 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 101 µg/L No EPA limit set | 416/419 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13 µg/L No EPA limit set | 412/415 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 63 µg/L No EPA limit set | 404/405 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 43 µg/L No EPA limit set | 396/402 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 370/389 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 133/406 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 114/398 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Nitrate | 3800 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 42/404 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Fluoride | 1620 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0027 mg/L 18% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Barium | 36.1 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 14/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2840 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 3.9 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 3 µg/L | 7/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/419 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chlordane | 0.0220 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 3/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.6 pCi/L 32% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.7 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Nitrite | 10 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 2/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 1.4 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 2/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toxaphene | 0.1290 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Baltimore
Is City of Baltimore tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in City of Baltimore's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Baltimore's water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Baltimore serve?
City of Baltimore reports serving 1,600,000 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has City of Baltimore had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 69 violations on file for City of Baltimore, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.