Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.31 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.9 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2022 |
| Fluoride | 460 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 16 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 8.14 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.24 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8000 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.46 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 7.2 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.7800 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wild Goose Crest Subdivision
Is Wild Goose Crest Subdivision tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Wild Goose Crest Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wild Goose Crest Subdivision's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wild Goose Crest Subdivision serve?
Wild Goose Crest Subdivision reports serving 65 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Wild Goose Crest Subdivision had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for Wild Goose Crest Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.