← Maryland

Tap water quality report

Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
9
detected
888
people served
35
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Frederick

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

35
health-based violations
35
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-08-31 → 1994-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-08-31 → 1994-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
104.4 µg/L 131%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
79.4 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.2 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2014
Bromodichloromethane
11.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.9 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2013–2016
Chloroform
114.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 127.6 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2013–2016
Dibromochloromethane
2.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2013–2016
Dichloroacetic Acid
46.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2016
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.355 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2016
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2016
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SMITH, JOSHUA
Phone
301-600-2581
Email
JSmith5@FrederickCountyMD.gov

Frequently asked questions about Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015

Is Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015 serve?

Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015 reports serving 888 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Cloverhill 3 - Consecutive to md0100015, of which 35 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.