Tap WaterIndex

← Maryland

Tap water quality report

West White Plains

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 71 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

71
contaminants tested
6
detected
50
people served
0
health-based violations
Maryland rankingsLead in MarylandPFAS in Maryland
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Charles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
50
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2023
Fluoride
238 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
1.46 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Barium
67 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Chloroform
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2014
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.6 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2014
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CROOKS, EDWARD
Phone
410-353-0383
Email
ecc989@hotmail.com

Frequently asked questions about West White Plains

Is West White Plains tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in West White Plains's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in West White Plains's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Fluoride, TTHM, Barium, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does West White Plains serve?

West White Plains reports serving 50 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has West White Plains had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 50 violations on file for West White Plains, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.