Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2003-11-01 → 2003-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2003-11-01 → 2003-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1999-05-15 → 1999-06-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1999-05-15 → 1999-06-14 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-01-24 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 10.1 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.85 µg/L | 31/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.394 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.78 µg/L | 29/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.24 µg/L | 24/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 23/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.275 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L | 22/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L | 21/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 19/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 19/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 11/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2023 |
| Barium | 46.25 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Copper | 450 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L | 6/23 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 155 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.9570 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 3/23 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Arsenic | 1.475 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.2855 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.32 pCi/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 2/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8270 pCi/L 17% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Endrin | 0.0110 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.9100 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
90 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Pleasant Valley Water
Is Pleasant Valley Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Pleasant Valley Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Pleasant Valley Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Pleasant Valley Water serve?
Pleasant Valley Water reports serving 1,683 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Pleasant Valley Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 207 violations on file for Pleasant Valley Water, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.