Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-09 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-09 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-09 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-09 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-09 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-09 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-05-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-05-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-05-21 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 49.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 55/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 76.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 55/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 179.5 µg/L 224% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 55/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 90 µg/L No EPA limit set | 54/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 98.3 µg/L 164% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 49/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 24.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 47/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set | 47/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 10 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 46/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 32.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 45/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 400 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 25/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 54 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lithium | 11.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area
Is Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area serve?
Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area reports serving 6,738 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 290 violations on file for Ebarb Wwks Dist # 1 - Aimwell Area, of which 255 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 12 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.