← Louisiana

Tap water quality report

Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 82 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

82
contaminants tested
21
detected
1,761
people served
569
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sabine Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

569
health-based violations
628
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
105.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
67/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
103.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
67/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
84.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
67/67 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
307.5 µg/L 384%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
67/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
177 µg/L 295%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
64/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
61/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
58/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
56/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
13.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
52/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
36/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
2500 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1200 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
16/26 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
20 µg/L 133%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
15/26 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
69 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
37 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.774 pCi/L 35%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
2/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.5800 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.97 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GARCIE, DONALD
Phone
318-645-7722
Email
donald.garcie@icloud.com

Frequently asked questions about Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb

Is Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb serve?

Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb reports serving 1,761 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.

Has Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 628 violations on file for Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb, of which 569 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.