Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 105.55 µg/L No EPA limit set | 67/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 103.29 µg/L No EPA limit set | 67/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 84.82 µg/L No EPA limit set | 67/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 307.5 µg/L 384% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 67/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 177 µg/L 295% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 64/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 44 µg/L No EPA limit set | 61/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27 µg/L No EPA limit set | 58/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set | 56/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13.84 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 98 µg/L No EPA limit set | 36/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 2500 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1200 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 16/26 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 20 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 15/26 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 13/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 69 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 37 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.774 pCi/L 35% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.5800 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.97 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb
Is Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb serve?
Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb reports serving 1,761 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 628 violations on file for Ebarb Wwks Dist #1 - North Ebarb, of which 569 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.