Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2000-07-01 → 2000-11-27 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-19 → 2000-11-27 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1300 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 49/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 21 µg/L 140% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 40/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.72 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 13.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 30.3 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.89 µg/L No EPA limit set | 13/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 16.5 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 13/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 310 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.24 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 220 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.1 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.2 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.31 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Hexachlorobenzene | 0.1970 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jeff Davis Water District 4
Is Jeff Davis Water District 4 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Jeff Davis Water District 4's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jeff Davis Water District 4's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jeff Davis Water District 4 serve?
Jeff Davis Water District 4 reports serving 4,194 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Jeff Davis Water District 4 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for Jeff Davis Water District 4, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.