Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1995-08-15 → 1995-09-15 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1995-08-15 → 1995-09-15 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 43.035 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 91.4 µg/L | 18/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L | 17/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 18.825 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.9 µg/L | 16/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 15/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 15/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 14.775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.1 µg/L | 14/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 21.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.3 µg/L | 14/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 455 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L | 10/19 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 10/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 29.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L | 9/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 278.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 150 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.6 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 3/19 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 5.59 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.20385 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.23 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.9105 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9200 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Park Subdivision Water
Is East Park Subdivision Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in East Park Subdivision Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Park Subdivision Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Park Subdivision Water serve?
East Park Subdivision Water reports serving 102 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has East Park Subdivision Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 56 violations on file for East Park Subdivision Water, of which 37 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.