← Louisiana

Tap water quality report

East Park Subdivision Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
18
detected
102
people served
37
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Calcasieu Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

37
health-based violations
56
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-02-15 → 1996-03-14
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-08-15 → 1995-09-15
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-08-15 → 1995-09-15

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
43.035 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 91.4 µg/L
18/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L
17/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
18.825 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.9 µg/L
16/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
15/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
15/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
14.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.1 µg/L
14/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
21.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.3 µg/L
14/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
455 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
10/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
10/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L
9/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2025
Barium
278.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
150 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
5.6 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
3/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
5.59 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.20385 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.23 pCi/L
2/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.9105 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9200 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/22 SYR4 2013–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BOOTH, AUSTIN
Phone
337-474-7325
Email
austin@boothenvironmental.com

Frequently asked questions about East Park Subdivision Water

Is East Park Subdivision Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in East Park Subdivision Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Park Subdivision Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Park Subdivision Water serve?

East Park Subdivision Water reports serving 102 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.

Has East Park Subdivision Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 56 violations on file for East Park Subdivision Water, of which 37 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.