Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-11 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-11 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 27.445 µg/L 183% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 81 µg/L | 64/83 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 4160 µg/L 320% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 6400 µg/L | 45/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.73 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0052 mg/L 35% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 10/15 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 10/15 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| TTHM | 107.36 µg/L 134% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 172 µg/L | 9/16 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Chloroform | 113.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 7/16 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Barium | 162.5 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Fluoride | 78.25 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.858 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 3/16 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.392 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.61 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.2325 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.24 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 2.182 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.27 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 120 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 1.834 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 6.9 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Friendship Water
Is Friendship Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Friendship Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Friendship Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Friendship Water serve?
Friendship Water reports serving 717 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Friendship Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 301 violations on file for Friendship Water, of which 48 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.