Tap WaterIndex

← Kentucky

Tap water quality report

Nebo Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 35 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

35
contaminants tested
6
detected
4,702
people served
73
health-based violations
Kentucky rankingsLead in KentuckyPFAS in Kentucky
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hopkins

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

73
health-based violations
77
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0079 µg/L 4/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
199 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 59/60 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
69 µg/L 115%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 51/51 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
140 µg/L 175%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2024
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 2/60 SYR4 2012–2018
29 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
MATHENY, MARK
Phone
270-249-3709
Email
nebowater@bellsouth.net

Frequently asked questions about Nebo Water District

Is Nebo Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Nebo Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Nebo Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Lead, Pfba, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Nebo Water District serve?

Nebo Water District reports serving 4,702 people in Kentucky, per its EPA record.

Has Nebo Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 77 violations on file for Nebo Water District, of which 73 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.