← Kentucky

Tap water quality report

Sharpsburg Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 35 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

35
contaminants tested
7
detected
4,332
people served
96
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bath

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

96
health-based violations
120
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0061 µg/L 1/8 2024
Pfpea 0.0050 µg/L 1/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
130 µg/L 163%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
147 µg/L 245%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
675 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Lead
4 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
11/40 SYR4 2014–2017
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
HANEY, GAYLE
Phone
606-247-2861
Email
gayleh12@windstream.net

Frequently asked questions about Sharpsburg Water District

Is Sharpsburg Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Sharpsburg Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sharpsburg Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sharpsburg Water District serve?

Sharpsburg Water District reports serving 4,332 people in Kentucky, per its EPA record.

Has Sharpsburg Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 120 violations on file for Sharpsburg Water District, of which 96 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.