Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 4485 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4600 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 161 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 7.865 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L | 12/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0036 mg/L 24% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2024 |
| Barium | 62.5 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Bromoform | 4.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Chloroform | 5.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Fluoride | 339 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.9660 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Selenium | 10.87 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 30.8 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.36 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Arsenic | 1.49 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 5 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.7 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Russell Co Rwd 2
Is Russell Co Rwd 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Russell Co Rwd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Russell Co Rwd 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Russell Co Rwd 2 serve?
Russell Co Rwd 2 reports serving 30 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Russell Co Rwd 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 78 violations on file for Russell Co Rwd 2, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.