← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Carbondale, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 62 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

62
contaminants tested
22
detected
1,344
people served
168
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Osage

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

168
health-based violations
233
violations on file
7
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
38.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
58.45 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
11.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
757 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2400 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
880 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
17/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
15/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
34.95 µg/L 233%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
14/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
5.95 µg/L 198%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L
11/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
11/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
95.5 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 99 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
389 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 410 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2020
Arsenic
1.47 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.75 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.085 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3000 pCi/L 6%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
40 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BESSETTE, EMILY
Phone
785-836-7108
Email
cityclerk@carbondaleks.com

Frequently asked questions about Carbondale, City of

Is Carbondale, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Carbondale, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Carbondale, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Carbondale, City of serve?

Carbondale, City of reports serving 1,344 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Carbondale, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 233 violations on file for Carbondale, City of, of which 168 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 7 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.