← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Erie, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 63 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

63
contaminants tested
21
detected
1,037
people served
134
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Neosho

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

134
health-based violations
187
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
80.3 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 83 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
26.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
64.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
41.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
94 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
66.2 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1875 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1900 µg/L
26/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
12.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
22/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.115 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
18/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
17/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
9.54 µg/L 318%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.9 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
9/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
110.9 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0042 mg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Arsenic
1.775 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.875 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
3.44 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
196 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
42 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KLINGENBERG, LESTER
Phone
620-244-3461
Email
cityclerk@erieks.com

Frequently asked questions about Erie, City of

Is Erie, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Erie, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Erie, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Erie, City of serve?

Erie, City of reports serving 1,037 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Erie, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 187 violations on file for Erie, City of, of which 134 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.