← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Protection, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 62 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

62
contaminants tested
17
detected
503
people served
16
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Comanche

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
71
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-07-21

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3700 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4200 µg/L
44/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
582 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 860 µg/L
37/38 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
11.65 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
11/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Arsenic
3.1 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
206 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
568 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
9.43 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
0.8860 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.8465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8600 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.0385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.6390 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6500 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1.89 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.44 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Atrazine
8.8 µg/L 293%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
45 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MONROE, JENNIFER
Phone
620-622-4696
Email
cityofprotection@unitedwireless.com

Frequently asked questions about Protection, City of

Is Protection, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Protection, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Protection, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Protection, City of serve?

Protection, City of reports serving 503 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Protection, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 71 violations on file for Protection, City of, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.