Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 6840 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6900 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 395.5 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 440 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 10.64 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 9/22 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0027 mg/L 18% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 22.25 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.725 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.946 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.69 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 240 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 1.495 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 314.5 µg/L 7.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Selenium | 5.165 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.5485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5500 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.7 pCi/L 34% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Horton, City of
Is Horton, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Horton, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Horton, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Horton, City of serve?
Horton, City of reports serving 1,514 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Horton, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 40 violations on file for Horton, City of, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.