← Indiana

Tap water quality report

East Washington Rural Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 35 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

35
contaminants tested
5
detected
8,613
people served
116
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

116
health-based violations
143
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
155 µg/L 194%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
223 µg/L 372%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
64 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2017
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Lead
2.3 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2017
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
BOULET, CHRIS
Phone
812-883-6429
Email
ewrw@blueriver.net

Frequently asked questions about East Washington Rural Water

Is East Washington Rural Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in East Washington Rural Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Washington Rural Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Washington Rural Water serve?

East Washington Rural Water reports serving 8,613 people in Indiana, per its EPA record.

Has East Washington Rural Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 143 violations on file for East Washington Rural Water, of which 116 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.