Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1990-05-14 → 1993-05-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1200 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 79/80 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 19 µg/L 127% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 52/80 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2026 |
| Nitrate | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 22.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 57.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 91.6 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.326 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28.2 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.96 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 53 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 875 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Arsenic | 2.4 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.3550 pCi/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.32 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about South Jacksonville
Is South Jacksonville tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in South Jacksonville's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in South Jacksonville's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does South Jacksonville serve?
South Jacksonville reports serving 3,501 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has South Jacksonville had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 150 violations on file for South Jacksonville, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.