← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Waterloo

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
16
detected
10,190
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Monroe

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
111
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0169 µg/L 3/4 2025
Pfpea 0.0032 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
159 µg/L 199%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
125/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
159 µg/L
No EPA limit set
124/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
117/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
33.2 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
117/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
115/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
110/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
42/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
4100 µg/L 315%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
35/80 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0044 mg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
24/24 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
12/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
19.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/4 UCMR-5 2025
Lead
6.04 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/80 SYR4 2013–2019
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
LANDECK, J. R.
Phone
618-939-8600

Frequently asked questions about Waterloo

Is Waterloo tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Waterloo's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Waterloo's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Waterloo serve?

Waterloo reports serving 10,190 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Waterloo had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 111 violations on file for Waterloo, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.