← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Cuba

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
1,184
people served
35
health-based violations
Water source
GUP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fulton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

35
health-based violations
115
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1985-08-01 → 1988-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1984-10-01 → 1988-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1984-10-01 → 1988-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1984-10-01 → 1988-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
243 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
23.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
31.7 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.8 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
15/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
27.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
11/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.88 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
4/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
LEASMAN, JUDY
Phone
309-785-5093
Email
cityclerk@cityofcubail.com

Frequently asked questions about Cuba

Is Cuba tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Cuba's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cuba's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cuba serve?

Cuba reports serving 1,184 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Cuba had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 115 violations on file for Cuba, of which 35 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.