← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
14
detected
863
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
GUP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fulton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0130 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0041 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0050 µg/L 4/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
Copper
250 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
5.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
6.84 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.1 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
3/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromochloromethaneHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
CARRUTHERS, JOSEPH R.
Phone
309-647-1391
Email
JCARRUTHERS@CANTONCITYHALL.ORG

Frequently asked questions about Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District

Is Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District serve?

Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District reports serving 863 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.