Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-04-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1910 µg/L 147% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 161/161 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 21.7 µg/L 145% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 44/161 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 26.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 77 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.97 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 109 µg/L 136% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 30/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 61.6 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 30/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 32 µg/L No EPA limit set | 30/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 930 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 15.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 24/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.83 µg/L No EPA limit set | 23/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00080 mg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 2200 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 2.15 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.5 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.85 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 191 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Bromoform | 0.5000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
71 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jefferson Water Department
Is Jefferson Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Jefferson Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jefferson Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jefferson Water Department serve?
Jefferson Water Department reports serving 4,182 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Jefferson Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 24 violations on file for Jefferson Water Department, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.