Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-05-01 → 2021-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-05-01 → 2021-05-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 2600 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 202 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 7.07 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 18.2 µg/L 121% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.38 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 55.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 35.9 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.3 pCi/L 66% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 57.6 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 431 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Chloroform | 11.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 300 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.83 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.55 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.27 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.79 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
42 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Table Mound Park
Is Table Mound Park tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Table Mound Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Table Mound Park's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Table Mound Park serve?
Table Mound Park reports serving 455 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Table Mound Park had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 45 violations on file for Table Mound Park, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.