Is Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Pueblo

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

157

health-based violations

414

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	12.87 pCi/L 257% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 22.5 pCi/L	43/45	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	33.965 pCi/L 226% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 67.62 pCi/L	36/44	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate	306.5 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 310 µg/L	22/36	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	16/16	LCR	2025
Combined Uranium	17.5 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 18 µg/L	11/44	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	79.75 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 80 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2016
Fluoride	337.5 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 340 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2016
Gross Beta Particle Activity	23.25 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 24 pCi/L	6/6	SYR4	2015–2017
Bromodichloromethane	24.016 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L	3/6	SYR4	2012–2017
Bromoform	3.627 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L	3/6	SYR4	2012–2017
Chloroform	146.89 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 163 µg/L	3/6	SYR4	2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane	8.19 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L	3/6	SYR4	2012–2017
TTHM	8.362 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2017
Dichloromethane	9.4735 µg/L 189% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L	2/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	56.15 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 57 µg/L	2/4	SYR4	2013–2014
Carbofuran	0.0700 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 40 µg/L	1/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	1.7 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2013–2017

63 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: BROWN, KENT
Phone: 719-485-2678
Email: 4KENTBROWN@GMAIL.COM

Frequently asked questions about Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc

Is Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Nitrate, Lead, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc serve?

Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc reports serving 66 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 414 violations on file for Signal Mountain Ranch Property Owners Wc, of which 157 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.