Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 30/30 | LCR | 2026 |
| TTHM | 93.615 µg/L 117% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 109 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 30.825 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.2 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 60.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 62 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.4 µg/L | 13/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 50.98 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.1 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L | 12/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.4 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 22.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.8 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Barium | 40.65 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 646 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 31.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.8 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.8565 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8700 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.4000 pCi/L 8% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.8000 pCi/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Selenium | 1.2 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
58 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Beulah Water Works District
Is Beulah Water Works District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Beulah Water Works District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Beulah Water Works District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Beulah Water Works District serve?
Beulah Water Works District reports serving 445 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Beulah Water Works District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 202 violations on file for Beulah Water Works District, of which 64 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.