← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Eureka Wc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
16
detected
498
people served
404
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Otero

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

404
health-based violations
713
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2026
Nitrate
900 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
22 pCi/L 440%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 5 pCi/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
35 pCi/L 233%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 pCi/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1330 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
7.2 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
12 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.98 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Arsenic
2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Bromoform
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
9.7 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2015
Nitrate-Nitrite
600 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Selenium
1 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BOND, BRIANNE
Phone
719-469-2987
Email
eurekawaterco@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Eureka Wc

Is Eureka Wc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Eureka Wc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Eureka Wc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Eureka Wc serve?

Eureka Wc reports serving 498 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Eureka Wc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 713 violations on file for Eureka Wc, of which 404 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.