Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 1600 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.045 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.365 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.785 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.49 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Fluoride | 458.5 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.46 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 178 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 8.16 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 8.4635 µg/L 141% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.86 µg/L | 2/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.49 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.4 pCi/L 48% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.7 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.961 pCi/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 620 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Lithium | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Brush City of
Is Brush City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Brush City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Brush City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Brush City of serve?
Brush City of reports serving 5,122 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Brush City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for Brush City of, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.