← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Battlement Mesa Md

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
19
detected
4,100
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Garfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
330
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
72.94 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 102 µg/L
65/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
34.4 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.3 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
39.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.8 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
15.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
26/28 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromoform
1.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
23/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Barium
57.4 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
9/28 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate
110 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.2475 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
6/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
228 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
4/28 SYR4 2015–2019
Lithium
54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 UCMR-5 2025
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Hexachlorobenzene
12 µg/L 1200%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BURKE, BRANDON
Phone
970-619-1856
Email
bburke@bmmetro.com

Frequently asked questions about Battlement Mesa Md

Is Battlement Mesa Md tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Battlement Mesa Md's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Battlement Mesa Md's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Battlement Mesa Md serve?

Battlement Mesa Md reports serving 4,100 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Battlement Mesa Md had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 330 violations on file for Battlement Mesa Md, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.