Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 1992-01-01 → 1994-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 87.6 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 393/393 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 74.2 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 393/393 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 56.3 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1730 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 520 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 40/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0057 mg/L 38% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 68 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.94 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 32.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Lithium | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/24 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 0.0740 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 10/51 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 6.5 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 6 µg/L | 8/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.79 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 5.1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 6/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 63.4 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.9 pCi/L 38% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 520 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 5/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.6 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 4/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 10 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Ethylbenzene | 6.78 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 3/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.5500 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Picloram | 0.1000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 500 µg/L | 1/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Colorado Springs Utilities
Is Colorado Springs Utilities tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Colorado Springs Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Colorado Springs Utilities's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Barium, Fluoride, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Colorado Springs Utilities serve?
Colorado Springs Utilities reports serving 464,111 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Colorado Springs Utilities had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Colorado Springs Utilities, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.