Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-08-01 → 2017-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-08-01 → 2017-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-08-01 → 2017-08-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 53.4 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 23.8 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 54/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chloroform | 12.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 18.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 33/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.37 µg/L No EPA limit set | 33/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 32/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.86 µg/L No EPA limit set | 32/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 32/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 19/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/34 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lithium | 32 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
25 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Northern Douglas County Wsd
Is Northern Douglas County Wsd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Northern Douglas County Wsd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Northern Douglas County Wsd's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Northern Douglas County Wsd serve?
Northern Douglas County Wsd reports serving 6,160 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Northern Douglas County Wsd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 48 violations on file for Northern Douglas County Wsd, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.