Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1998-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 48.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 29.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 91.5 µg/L 114% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 133 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 17.9 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 55/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 10.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 54/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 46/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 46/46 | LCR | 2023 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 22/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 15/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 2/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu
Is Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu serve?
Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu reports serving 5,700 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.