Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-08-01 → 2015-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 9400 µg/L 94% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11661.6 µg/L | 444/444 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 59/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 75.6 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95 µg/L | 59/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 58/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 54 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 95 µg/L | 51/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 51.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71 µg/L | 48/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 43/43 | LCR | 2025 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 41/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 32/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 30/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 22/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 17/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 500 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lithium | 49 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 4100 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4200 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 26.59 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.7 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Chromium | 156.8 µg/L 157% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 174 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Selenium | 1.9 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.49 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
90 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ventura River Water District
Is Ventura River Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Ventura River Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ventura River Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ventura River Water District serve?
Ventura River Water District reports serving 6,100 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Ventura River Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Ventura River Water District, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.