← California

Tap water quality report

Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 27 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

27
contaminants tested
7
detected
150
people served
21
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Tuolumne

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

21
health-based violations
42
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2023
Chloroform
83.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2018
TTHM
85.2 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/3 SYR4 2017–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2017–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2017–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2017–2018
20 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalArsenicBariumBeryllium, TotalBromoformCopperCadmiumChromiumDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneFluorideLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
BROWN, BRENTON
Phone
209-984-5287
Email
Brenton.brown@fire.ca.gov

Frequently asked questions about Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp

Is Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp serve?

Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp reports serving 150 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 42 violations on file for Cal Fire Baseline Conservation Camp, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.