Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1997-11-01 → 1997-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 2003-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 8542.8 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 240/414 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 8540 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 75/87 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrite | 0.0100 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 4/101 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 200 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 110 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 2.18 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 2/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 11 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
46 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Waterford - Hickman
Is Waterford - Hickman tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Waterford - Hickman's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Waterford - Hickman's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Nitrite, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Waterford - Hickman serve?
Waterford - Hickman reports serving 597 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Waterford - Hickman had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Waterford - Hickman, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.