Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Archived | 1989-06-01 → 1989-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Archived | 1988-11-01 → 1988-11-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 38 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 127/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 126/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 126/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24 µg/L No EPA limit set | 125/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 116/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 111/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 96/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 62/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 54/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 3700 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 50/84 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 41/41 | LCR | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 14 µg/L 140% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10 µg/L | 29/33 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lithium | 36 µg/L No EPA limit set | 13/13 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Copper | 570 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 3/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Fluoride | 400 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3000 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2017–2018 |
| Methoxychlor | 110 µg/L 275% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 40 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 3.5 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2017–2018 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Valley of the Moon Water District
Is Valley of the Moon Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Valley of the Moon Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Valley of the Moon Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Valley of the Moon Water District serve?
Valley of the Moon Water District reports serving 23,107 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Valley of the Moon Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Valley of the Moon Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.