← California

Tap water quality report

Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 27 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

27
contaminants tested
10
detected
2,006
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Shasta

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
11
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Addressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30
RPT Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
5.117 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
49.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.6 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.1 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
53.86 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.5 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.35 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.7 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.83 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.6 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2024
Arsenic
2.3 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Lead
16 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2014
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/19 SYR4 2012–2019
17 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalAsbestosBariumBeryllium, TotalBromoformCopperCadmiumChromiumDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneFluorideMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNitrateNitriteSeleniumThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
BEARD, CHARLEEN
Phone
530-225-5661
Email
cbeard@shastacounty.gov

Frequently asked questions about Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6

Is Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6 serve?

Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6 reports serving 2,006 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 11 violations on file for Shasta Csa - Jones Valley, #6, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.