Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-04-01 → 2008-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-04-01 → 2008-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-03-01 → 1995-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-03-01 → 1995-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 60.929 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.83 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 62.021 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.22 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 52.515 µg/L 88% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.6 µg/L | 118/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 30.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L | 117/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L | 116/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.495 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.25 µg/L | 91/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 36/36 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate | 3331.5 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3390 µg/L | 34/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 17/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 13/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 240 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 6/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 520660 µg/L 5207% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 650000 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 128.5 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Selenium | 7.36 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 9.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/8 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 2.2 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Asbestos | 0.7000 MFL 10% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2017 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso
Is City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso serve?
City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso reports serving 45,559 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for City of San Jose - Nsj/Alviso, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.