Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 361.6 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1209.5 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00020 mg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 352 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L | 5/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 488.5 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Chromium | 0.8260 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8400 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.23655 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.29481 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| TTHM | 10.92 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.865 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.765 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.5500 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Asbestos | 0.2000 MFL 2.9% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.5600 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.2900 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.05 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Lead | 0.4100 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrite | 0.3800 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Lupin Lodge
Is Lupin Lodge tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Lupin Lodge's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Lupin Lodge's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Fluoride, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Lupin Lodge serve?
Lupin Lodge reports serving 300 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Lupin Lodge had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 57 violations on file for Lupin Lodge, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.