Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBS | 0.0035 µg/L | 2/23 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 4248.8 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 74/76 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 24.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 67 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 22.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 61/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 59/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set | 58/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16 µg/L No EPA limit set | 47/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 36/36 | LCR | 2023 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 26/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 41.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/23 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 300 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 15/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 5 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 13/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 23 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 12/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 16.539 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 900000 µg/L 9000% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10000 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 57.8 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 2 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 4/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 4 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 3/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cadmium | 0.2000 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 2/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.4 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 2/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 30 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Mercury | 0.0200 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Solvang Water Division
Is Solvang Water Division tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Solvang Water Division's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Solvang Water Division's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Solvang Water Division serve?
Solvang Water Division reports serving 6,126 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Solvang Water Division had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 38 violations on file for Solvang Water Division, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.