← California

Tap water quality report

Goleta Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 113 contaminants and detected 32. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

113
contaminants tested
32
detected
84,462
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Santa Barbara

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0045 µg/L 2/22 2025
Pfpea 0.0059 µg/L 2/22 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
100 µg/L 125%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
289/299 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
285/299 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
40 µg/L
No EPA limit set
282/299 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
270/299 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
233/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
212/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
208/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
207/299 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
205/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
650 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
131/131 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
8.642 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
56/93 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
4500 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
50/314 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
35/35 LCR 2024
Lithium
53.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
22/22 UCMR-5 2025
Arsenic
11 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10 µg/L
21/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.4 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
16/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
100000 µg/L 1000%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10000 µg/L
13/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
9/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
19 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
8/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
130 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
7/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
25 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
4/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
170 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
3/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
1 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
3/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Asbestos
0.3900 MFL 5.6%
of the EPA limit 7 MFL
2/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
38 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
2/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
3.3 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
2/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
67 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.08 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MATSON, DAVID
Phone
805-879-4621
Email
dmatson@goletawater.com

Frequently asked questions about Goleta Water District

Is Goleta Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 32 contaminants in Goleta Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Goleta Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Goleta Water District serve?

Goleta Water District reports serving 84,462 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Goleta Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Goleta Water District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.