Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Cachuma Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 46 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

46
contaminants tested
6
detected
60
people served
4
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Santa Barbara

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-12-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-12-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-08-01 → 2001-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-08-01 → 2001-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-06-01 → 2020-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-06-01 → 2020-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 5/5 LCR 2025
Fluoride
350 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrate
100 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
43.6 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
0.9000 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
40 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformDichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneLassoMercuryNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GONSALVES, CODY
Phone
805-331-3504
Email
CODY@SANLUCASRANCH.COM

Frequently asked questions about Cachuma Village

Is Cachuma Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Cachuma Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cachuma Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Fluoride, Nitrate, Barium, Chromium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cachuma Village serve?

Cachuma Village reports serving 60 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Cachuma Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Cachuma Village, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.