Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-12-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-12-01 → 2010-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.3045 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.61 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.0205 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.4 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.6775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.37 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 46.295 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 53.8 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 62.7035 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.8 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 73.035 µg/L 122% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.4 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.3 µg/L | 160/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 108/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 36/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 447.5 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 530 µg/L | 26/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromoform | 2.256 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.52 µg/L | 9/162 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.74 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 7/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 5/161 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 4100 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 81 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.2100 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc
Is Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc serve?
Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc reports serving 915 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 74 violations on file for Cuesta La Honda Guild Inc, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.