← California

Tap water quality report

Portola Improvement Association Mwc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
14
detected
90
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Private
Counties served
San Mateo

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
53
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1980-06-01 → 1982-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
29/29 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
23.286 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
31.682 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.28 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
16.554 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.86 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.7 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
73.166 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.4 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41.32 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 44.8 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
180 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.6685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
247 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Cadmium
1.095 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FITZGERALD, YVETTE
Phone
650-947-9687
Email
yvette@piamwco.org

Frequently asked questions about Portola Improvement Association Mwc

Is Portola Improvement Association Mwc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Portola Improvement Association Mwc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Portola Improvement Association Mwc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Portola Improvement Association Mwc serve?

Portola Improvement Association Mwc reports serving 90 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Portola Improvement Association Mwc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 53 violations on file for Portola Improvement Association Mwc, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.