Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Woodlands Development

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
10
detected
3,862
people served
0
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
San Luis Obispo

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
3
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-06-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
4600 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
4500 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 9/9 SYR4 2017–2019
TTHM
6.2 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
320 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 4/7 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
5.513 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2012
Selenium
5.1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2017
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MILLER, ROB
Phone
805-540-5208
Email
RobM@wallacegroup.us

Frequently asked questions about Woodlands Development

Is Woodlands Development tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Woodlands Development's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodlands Development's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodlands Development serve?

Woodlands Development reports serving 3,862 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Woodlands Development had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Woodlands Development, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.