Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-10-01 → 2004-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-10-01 → 2004-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1789.73 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2327.8 µg/L | 34/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 42.55 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.6 µg/L | 34/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 31/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L | 31/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0053 mg/L 35% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 31/31 | LCR | 2020 |
| Chloroform | 22.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L | 29/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 28/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 26/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.625 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L | 26/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L | 23/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 429.95 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 619 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 15/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.25 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 11/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 110 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 7/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 753000 µg/L 7530% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 812000 µg/L | 5/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 33.6 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 3/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.2 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.1356 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 18.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
40 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp
Is Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp serve?
Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp reports serving 0 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Slo Csa No. 10 - Cayucos Wtp, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.