Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 2000-03-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.3 µg/L | 144/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 49.98 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.3 µg/L | 144/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 16.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.5 µg/L | 144/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.5 µg/L | 143/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 47.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.8 µg/L | 143/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 73.44 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 106.9 µg/L | 143/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 16.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L | 139/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L | 137/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 73/143 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 7.2 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L | 71/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 47/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 203 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L | 18/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 628.25 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 935 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 30 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 6/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 111.192 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00079 mg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 2/2 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 3.09 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
45 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Lopez Project
Is Lopez Project tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Lopez Project's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Lopez Project's water?
EPA monitoring detected Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Lopez Project serve?
Lopez Project reports serving 1,569 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Lopez Project had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for Lopez Project, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.